Wednesday, May 27, 2026

Wake Wednesday 250: 1775-1776 A Time of Resolve

Britain had spent the better portion of 1774 trying to squelch all dissent and rebellion in the colonies by making Massachusetts the scapegoat and example in their hard line drawn with the Intolerable Acts. The Acts had the exact opposite effect. The other colonies were watching and sensing that they would suffer equal harshness soon enough. Rather than standing by, the other colonies acted in support of Massachusetts by engaging in boycotts of British goods. They sent aid and support to Boston. They began organizing and holding clandestine meetings to discuss their dissent and possible actions. They were, in effect, forming a shadow government. This was occurring widely across all thirteen colonies.

 
"Halifax Resolves mural" by Francis Vandeveer Kughler. Source
 

In North Carolina, these clandestine meetings led to two very important documents written in the year leading up to the Revolution. The documents are the Mecklenburg Resolves made May 31, 1755, and the Halifax Resolves made April 12, 1776. Read together, they reveal how North Carolinians moved from local resistance to a colony wide commitment to break from Britain.

The Mecklenburg Resolves emerged from a tense moment in Mecklenburg County only weeks after the first shots were fired at Lexington and Concord. Local leaders declared that British laws were no longer valid in the colonies and that governing authority should instead rest in local and provincial bodies chosen by the people. In practice, this meant that, at least in Mecklenburg, residents were prepared to act as if they were no longer governed by Parliament at all. The document did not spell out “independence” in the modern sense, but it amounted to a radical restructuring of political authority on the ground.

The Mecklenburg Resolves:

Rejected royal and parliamentary authority.

Shifted power to local colonial leadership.

Ordered militia readiness and weapons supplies.

Established county-level measures for order and defense.

Read a transcription of the Mecklenburg Resolves

Less than a year later, the Halifax Resolves transformed that local spirit into an official colony wide stance. Meeting in April 1776, the Fourth Provincial Congress in Halifax authorized North Carolina’s delegates at the Continental Congress to vote for independence and to join in forming foreign alliances. This was the first formal instruction from any colony explicitly empowering its representatives to support independence for all the American colonies. Where Mecklenburg declared a break at the county level, Halifax announced a commitment by the whole colony to seek complete political separation.

The Halifax Resolves:

Empowered North Carolina's delegates to the Continental Congress to vote for independence from Great Britain

Authorized forming foreign alliances with other nations.

Reserved North Carolina's exclusive right to form its own constitution and laws.

Allowed North Carolina to appoint its own delegates to meet with other colonies for future         purposes.

Read a partial transcription of the Halifax Resolves

The fact that these two documents “bookend” the final year of North Carolina’s colonial existence illustrates the change in thought as the idea of independent freedom took hold. At one end, Mecklenburg shows ordinary North Carolinians experimenting with self government and rejecting imperial authority in their own communities. At the other, Halifax shows their representatives integrating that radicalism into a broader, coordinated American project—one that included diplomacy, constitutional design, and national independence. In between lay resolves and debates from other counties, Mecklenburg and Halifax captured the shift from rebellion within an empire to participation in founding a new nation.



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org




Tuesday, May 26, 2026

AAHGS-Triangle America 250 Speaker Series - Saundra Cropps Presents July 13

Our own Saundra Russ Cropps will share her presentation on People of Color During the Revolutionary War in Granville and Wake Counties, North Carolina. Sign up before July 13 to hear her talk. Details are in the poster. This is a four part series. Other dates and topics are included in the second poster. Sign up once and you are registered for all the talks. 

Link to register

Details for the rest of the dates -  

June 8, July 13, Aug 10, and Sept 14

Click to enlarge image

Address questions to AAHGS NC Triangle Chapter America 250 Speaker Series



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Thursday, May 21, 2026

2026 Wake County Genealogical Society Virtual Meetings - next - May 26, 2026

Reminder! There is still time to register for this free presentation on small family cemetery restoration. Hope to see you Tuesday night.

Tuesday, May 26, 2026 @ 6:30pm – Virtual

Topic: Preserving Small Family Cemeteries

Speaker: Joel Hobby

The preservation of the McCuller Cemetery located off of Donnybrook Rd in southern Wake County has come a long way since the idea was born in 2022. From a nearly invisible resting place covered in brambles at risk from a looming development project, it has emerged as a neat, cared for cemetery with a historical marker and volunteers dedicated to keeping it visible and historically relevant. Come here the story of the McCuller process from idea, to strategic planning, fund raising, historical research, and volunteering. Joel is a McCuller descendent and will share his experiences.

 Join us!  Free and virtual!

*Please register by 4pm day of meeting.

*Please save your passcode and link for ease of entry at start time.

*Presentation starts promptly at 6:30 pm.

View a blog post about the early efforts here - 
https://wakecogen.blogspot.com/2023/01/seeking-input-to-save-historically.html


Link to register at the Wakecogen website events page. 

Registration is now open!

**Get the video recording to watch on-demand for 30 days and access to our webinar handout library with your WCGS membership!**

        ** At presenters discretion.



Upcoming Events 

View events page for details 

Tuesday, May 26, 2026 @ 6:30pm - Virtual
Preserving Small Family Cemeteries
Presented by Joel Hobby 

Tuesday, Jun 23, 2026 @ 6:30pm - Virtual
Fishing in Every Pond: Cousin Baiting
presented by Christine Cohen

Tuesday, Jul 28, 2026 @ 6:30pm - Virtual
Early Migration and Settlement Patterns 
presented by J. Mark Lowe

Tuesday, Aug 25, 2026 @ 6:30pm - Virtual
Doing European Research When You Don't Speak the Language 
presented by Jessica Conklin


Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources |  Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org



Tuesday, May 19, 2026

Explore Free Women of Color During the Revolution with NC Archives - June 11

Press Release from the NC Archives:

Telling Our NC 250 Story: Free Women of Color in Revolutionary North Carolina
Thu, Jun 11 2026, 12 - 1pm


A panel of cultural heritage scholars and descendants will discuss free women of color during the Revolutionary Era. Hundreds of records from multiple archives—including freedom papers, census lists, marriage records, and estate accounts at the State Archives—document the lives of these women, along with their families and communities. Panelists will explore the experiences of these remarkable women who navigated the complex cultural, legal, and racial terrain of North Carolina and the new nation. Register for Telling Our Story before the digital presentation on June 11 at noon. 

Address questions to contact at this link - 

https://archives.ncdcr.gov/news/events/telling-our-nc-250-story-free-women-color-revolutionary-north-carolina




Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Monday, May 18, 2026

WCGS Featured in Latest Family Tree Magazine City Guide

Family Tree Magazine offers many finding aides and guides at the city, county and state level on their website. Enter their recently updated Raleigh, NC City Guide for Genealogists. We are quite surprised and pleased to find our Wake Treasures journal and our website referenced and linked as resources on the webpage. WCGS is gratified that our efforts to facilitate the goals of research, preservation, education and collaboration are recognized in this way. Visit the Raleigh Guide webpage for a host of useful resource links. 



Visit the Guide!



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Saturday, May 16, 2026

Upchurch and Allied Families Association Newsletter - May 2026

For those following along, here is the latest Upchurch and Allied Families Association Newsletter.

May 2026

Focus is on Memorial Day




Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Friday, May 15, 2026

Join Wakecogen for "Coffee & Conversation" - July 16 Meet-up

Join Wakecogensoc for "Coffee & Conversation" 


What - July Meet-up

When - Thursday, July 16, at 9:30 am 

Where - Panera Bread - (Glenwood/Pleasant Valley), 

6201 Glenwood Avenue, Raleigh, NC 27612


Designed by pch.vector / Freepik

Our first coffee gathering was so fun, we are going to do it again! 

We’ll chat about what genealogical topics we're working on, or a brick wall, or ask other members how to do something. 

No RSVP - just show up, order your beverage or food, and look around for Barbara at a large table with a sign for WCGS.

We tentatively plan to hold several more “Coffee and Conversation” events on different days and locations throughout 2026. If you are interested in hosting one, email President@WakeCoGen.org and we'll choose a date and location.


Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources |  Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Coffee and Convo Summary and Photos - April 29

On Wednesday, April 29, Members of WCGS met in Cary at the Panera Bread at Parkside for casual conversation about genealogy and other favorite topics. Thanks to Barbara and Sherry for planning this great outing. - CD


In photo: seated: Ed Webb and Sherry Gajewski.
Standing: Barbara McGeachy, Carol Kimball Stahl,
Jennie Gunther, and Gayle Williams.
Photo graciously taken by an anonymous man.

Barbara’s Summary:

“We stayed about ninety minutes and discussed many genealogical topics. Some highlights: 

Sherry recently scanned some photos and added them online. A distant cousin saw her photos of their family and shared their photos of Sherry's family that she had never seen. Another cousin was able to identify people in a family reunion photo. 

Jennie attended the recent NC State Archives presentation about artifact preservation. They only discussed paper preservation. We all agreed that we’d love to have a session on preserving non-paper artifacts. The NC Museum of History handles this topic on "Conservation Days" but the museum is closed for another couple of years. They haven't held "Conservation Days" for several years but reportedly, they plan to restart them at other historic sites. 

Carol Zoomed into a fun genealogical scavenger hunt held in Maine. The organizer sent a list of questions for participants to answer about their direct ancestors, such as the most number of marriages, most number of kids, unusual occupations, etc. People shared their answers at the meeting. 

Jennie attended (via Zoom) a recent Pikes Peak Genealogical Society meeting whose topic was “share & tell.” Each person was asked to share a website that they were interested in but had never used. Jennie shared “Dead Fred.” ”

There are plans in the works for other dates in various spots around Wake County. If you are interested and know of a spot for a future gathering let us know. 

Next Coffee and Conversation!
Thursday,  July 16, 9:30 am at the Panera Bread on Glenwood. - Watch for official post soon.

https://www.panerabread.com/en-us/cafe/locations/nc/raleigh/6201-glenwood-avenue



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org


Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Wake Wednesday 250: 1774, A Year of Intolerable Acts

The year 1774 opened to increasing divisiveness between British Parliament and the colonists. Resentment and hostilities were fomenting on both sides. The King and Parliament were insensed by Massachusetts colonists' revolt - the Boston Tea party - in December of 1773.

Another round of opressive measures were enacted directed at quelling rebellion and stripping govenment powers at a local provincial level. Britain was laser focused on Massachusetts, but their fury and strident restrictions sent a shudder through out all the thirteen colonies. The colonists' unease harkened back to the days of the 1760s between the French & Indian War and the Regulator movement.

Over the course of that year, the British enacted no less than five new acts, collectively called the Coercive Acts. The Acts were the most punitive and restrictive thus far. Their oppressive nature lead the colonists to call them "Intolerable" instead. While these acts specifically singled out Massachusetts, they were designed to tighten imperial control over all the American colonies. Colonists in all provinces felt that Britain wanted to strip away their rights and govern them by force.

This summary of the new laws brought forth in 1774 illustrates just how enraged and vindictive Britain was at this point.

Bostonians in Distress
Source

The Intolerable Acts of 1774 (aka The Coervcive Acts)

The Boston Port Act (March 31) was enacted directly and specifically to punish Boston and Massechusetts for the Boston Tea Party. The Port of Boston was closed and was to remain so until the damaged tea was paid for. The colonists refused. The port economy was shuttered from June 1, 1774 until early in 1776. This resulted in dire ecomonic consequences as much of the port city's commerce was tied to import and exports to Britain and other places. 

The Massachusetts Government Act (May 20) stripped much of Massachusetts' self-government and put the control in the hand of the Royal Governor, Thomas Gage. Limits were imposed on town meeting. Local government officials were replaced and their replacements were appointed by the Royal Governor rather than elected by peers. 

The Administration of Justice Act (May 20) gave British official accused of crimes in Massachusetts the option to have their trials moved outside the colony and have them tried in Britain instead. Yes, back home where their buddies were. Frustrated colonists referred to this one as "the Murder Act." The consensus was that the royal appointees could get away with murder now that there was less local accountability.

The Quartering Act (June 2) made provisions for a standing British army to be housed in the colonies thus allowing for ready enforcement should the colonists show the inclination to revolt again.

The Quebec Act (June 22) was not a punishment per se (and technically not one of the Coercive Acts), but the colonists reacted to it in the same way and saw it as just as intrusive to their liberties as the others. Britain's efforts to reorganize Quebec’s government, protect Catholic worship, and secure control of the region did not sit well. The colonists saw this move as Catholic favoritism, more overreach of royal power, and another attempt to block settlement into the less populated and more fertile lands to the west. 

Reactions

The other colonies were watching and listening. They were shocked by what had come to pass. They sent aid and support to Boston. They feared the attack on representative government and their own personal liberty. They expected more corruption and feared the British officials would use the Justice act to escape punishment by counting on the good graces of their cronies back home. The specter of a perpetually standing army was another intrusion on their liberty and self determination. They could not even move farther west to be left alone in the back country as they had in the past.  They responded with further resistance. They boycotted British goods. They engaged in provincial political organizing. 

Provincial NC fit this pattern of thinking perfectly. Her reaction was less about one single dramatic event and more about a rapid move toward unity, boycott, and extra-legal colonial government in response to the sense that Parliament could punish any colony the way it punished Massachusetts.

We will look to the early NC hamlets of Halifax, and Mecklenburg as examples of what changes the Intolerable Acts had set in motion in next in the next post.

Explore More:

The Intolerable Acts: When British Punishment Pushed America Toward Revolution

The Colonial Responses to the Intolerable Acts

The Intolerable Acts | How Did the British React to the Boston Tea Party?

In the common cause: American response to the Coercive acts of 1774 by Ammerman, David. University Press of Virginia. 1974. Access through Internet Archive. Link

A Comprehensive timeline from 1763- 1775 from the George Washington Library at Mount Vernon.



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Wednesday, May 6, 2026

Wake Wednesday 250 - The British Will Know Who We Are - Penelope Barker 1773 - Edenton Tea Party

Piedmont colonists (including those living in Wake County, now just two years young) lived with a mix of routine frontier hardship and growing political stress as the colony inched toward revolution. Day‑to‑day life was physically demanding and often uncertain. 

With only a few poor roads in and out of the area, travel and trade with the coast and Virginia was limited. They had to produce most everything for themselves and barter for what they couldn't make and hope to bring in a bit of cash if they managed a good bargain with their neighbors. 

They lived in a subsistance economy that required hands-on effort for everything - clearing land, planting seed, tending animals, working fields, building homes, barns and fences, making their own cloth, soap and food items that didn't grow from the ground.

The Regulator uprising that had just been chaotically resolved, had already left many backcountry farmers angry at corrupt officials and unfair taxes. By 1773, neighbors were beginning to split into Patriots, Loyalists, and “middlers,” which created local feuds and fear of raids on farms, even before the large battles that would come later.

Weak formal government and few royal troops actually stationed across the vast colony left many families exposed to threats from Native groups, outlaws, or even armed bands from the other side of the Patriot–Loyalist divide

The daily physical labor, isolation, limited trade, and growing political‑military tension made ordinary life hard in this time of growing uncertainty. While the colonists were dealing with all of this, the Parliment just kept piling on more taxes, laws and regulations. Enter the -

The Tea Act of 1773

Parliament hoped to shore up the financially troubled British East India Company by reducing the massive amount of tea held in its London warehouses. This Tea Act 2.0 extended the Townshend Tea and was an attempt to undercut the price of smuggled Dutch tea. English tea was priced less than smuggled tea, but the imposed tax made it politically unpalatable. Colonists objected to the monopoly and another tax. It was also another signal from Parliament of its right to tax the colonies as it saw fit. You know what happened next...

A Tea Party, of sorts

In December 1773, Massachusetts colonial  protestors destroyed a large shipment of tea in Boston Harbor to show their anger at this new round of "taxation without representation." Their dissent was violent and destructive. The event lives on in history as the Boston Tea Party.  (Fun fact, the 342 chests of tea destroyed during the "party" would be worth over $1.7 million in today's currency.)

The Tea tax bothered a certain group of North Carolinians mightily. In October 1774, 51 women in Edenton set out to stage their own protest. They resolved to boycott British tea and cloth in support of the Patriot cause. Dubbed the Edenton Tea Party, this was one of the earliest organized political actions by women in our country's history and a non-violent one at that. Our foremothers were teaching us the nonviolent power of the consumer

“Maybe it has only been men who have protested the King up to now. That only means we women have taken too long to let our voices be heard. We are signing our names to a document, not hiding ourselves behind costumes like the men in Boston did at their tea party. The British will know who we are.”    
 
- Penelope Barker, signer of the Edenton Petition


"A Society of Patriotic Ladies" British Museum 965125001
British editorial cartoon - unflattering portrayal of the 
Edenton Ladies.

News of the Edenton Tea Party spread quickly through out the colony. No doubt the local papers carried the signed petition of the steadfast rebellious women. A search of NC Digital did not turn up any issues of NC papers extant at this time. I did find a nice example of their petition in the Virginia Gazette published in colonial Williamsburg via the Women and the American Story website. You can examine for yourself below.


Enlarge for easier viewing
Source: Virginia Gazette (Williamsburg, Va.), 1774-11-03; Number 1213. Colonial Williamsburg Foundation. John D. Rockefeller Jr. Library. Special Collections. Link 


Here is a transcript of the petition as shown in the Virginia Gazette:

"As we cannot be indifferent on any occasion that appears nearly to affect the peace and happiness of our country, and as it has been thought necessary, for the public good, to enter into several particular resolves by a meeting of Members deputed from the whole Province it is a duty which we owe, not only to our near and dear connections who have concurred in them, but to ourselves who are essentially interested in their welfare, to do everything as far as lies in our power to testify our sincere adherence to the same; and we do therefore accordingly subscribe this paper, as a witness of our fixed intention and solemn determination to do so."

Check out the names of the 51 signatories. Do you find any ancestors there? Note that Penelope Barker appears about midway down the left column.

The petition was also published in London papers. It drew backlash there. The cartoon above portrayed "the women ... as ugly, immoral, and neglectful of their duties as wives and mothers. The artist drew them this way because he thought it was unnatural for women to publicly share their political opinions. The cartoon also mocks the British government by showing that they have managed the colonies so badly that even women feel like they can openly rebel." 

Tensions were boiling as 1773 drew to a close. NC colonists were feeling angry, resentful and rebellious while Parliament sought any way possible to exert control assert their authority. More heinous acts were on the horizon. In fact, the following year produced a torent of them. The colonist would find them intolerable!

Explore More:

NSDAR Acknowledges Patriotic Actions of 51 NC Women



Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Wake Wednesday 250: Voices From Both Sides of the War of Regulation

While researching the last post about the Regulators, I found some interesting tidbits of the time period that show the divisions and angst building on both sides. 

To set the stage, the time frame covered here runs from the Hillsborough Riot in September 1771 to Nov 1771 (six month after the Battle of Alamance - May 1771). The Hillsborough Riot is summarized as a violent uprising by the North Carolina Regulators who stormed the superior court in Hillsborough on September 22-25, 1770 with their protests of political corruption, exorbitant legal fees, and cronyism, resulting in the beating of officials and destruction of property, including that of "his Majesty's Associate Justice," Edmund Fanning. 

A Proclamation

This set Governor Tryon's blood a'boil. Within the month, he published the notice that appears below. This newspaper article from the Regulator era appeared in the The Cape-Fear mercury. (Wilmington [N.C.]), Sept. 1, 1770, edition 1, Page 2. This papers is available online at Digital NC and viewable at the source link below.

Source

The following is a modernized paraphrasing of the original notice*. It is characterized as an early "wanted poster" against what amounted to "damned roguery." Here is the gist of Governor Tryon's order -

What Happened
I have been informed that on September 25th,1770 a large, violent mob gathered in Hillsborough while the Superior Court was in session. This group didn't just protest; they broke the law and caused total chaos. Specifically, they:
  • Attacked a judge while he was trying to do his job.
  • Brutally beat and injured several people inside the courtroom.
  • Insulted the government and destroyed the private property of local residents.
  • Committed treasonous acts by publicly drinking toasts wishing for the death of King George III and cheering for "the Pretender" (the King's political rival).

The Order
To make sure these people are brought to justice, I am working with my Council to issue this order. I am officially requiring all Justices of the Peace to:
  • Conduct a thorough investigation into these crimes.
  • Take formal written statements (depositions) from anyone who has information or saw what happened. 
Next Steps
All of these witness statements must be sent to me immediately. I will present them to the General Assembly when they meet in New Bern on November 30th. We are reconvening at that time to handle this urgent government business.

Signed,
William Tryon
(October 18, 1770)

*Paraphrased modern english version by Google Gemini


This Johnston Riot Act 

The upshot of Tryon's mandate was the adoption of the Johnston Riot Act in January, 1771, The intent of this strict, new law was to control and punish the Regulators. Entitled "An Act for Preventing tumultuous and riotous Assemblies," it required -

  • Crowd dispersal within one hour of order
  • Authorized seizing rioter property
  • Authorized declaring protestors outlaws
  • Allowed the use of deadly force on rioters or declared outlaws
  • Allowed trials to be moved to any court in the province rather than be tried in the court nearest home.


Battle of Alamance

The law was intended to be temporary and last just one year. Before the year was up, in May, 1771, a standoff occured at a spot near Alamance Creek. A gathering of about 2,000 Regulators seen as a dangerous, angry mob were ordered to disperse by the sheriff of Orange County, John Butler. His order follows-

"Great Alamance Camp May 16, 1771

In answer to your Petition, I am to acquaint you that I have ever been attentive to the true Interest of this Country, and to that of every Individual residing within it. I lament the fatal Necessity to which you have now reduced me, by withdrawing yourselves from the Mercy of the Crown, and the Laws of your Country, to require you who are Assembled as Regulators, to lay down your Arms, Surrender up the outlawed Ringleaders, and Submit yourselves to the Laws of your Country, and then, rest on the lenity and Mercy of Government. By accepting these Terms in one Hour from the delivery of this Dispatch you will prevent an effusion of Blood, as you are at this time in a state of War and Rebellion against your King, your Country, and your Laws." - source

Given the ultimatum, the Regulators ignored the dispersal order and chose to stand and fight. They were defeated by Tryon's forces in about two hours of fighting. 

Now in open rebellion to the provincial government and facing the harsh punishment mandated under the Johnston Act, the Regulators' standing was tenuous. Many were forced to flee as outlaws, many hand their land possessions and fortunes confiscated, and six were hanged. 

The Atticus Letter

A famous letter of protest exists from this time period, penned under the pseudomym "Atticus."  This letter appeared in the Virginia Gazette on November 7, 1771. The author heavily criticized North Carolina Royal Governor William Tryon for his harsh handling of the Regulator uprising and the Battle of Alamance. (This excerpt was found on a Facebook Group dedicated to the Battle of Alamance. )


source

"Atticus" is believed to be Maurice Moore, a colonial judge with Regulator leaning sympathies. This was an "open letter" to Tryon that appeared in the Virginia Gazette, November 7, 1771. The author's grievences included Tryon's oppressive policies, mishandling public funds, and instigating conflict with the Regulators. Atticus criticizes Tryon's self-serving actions, lavish spending on a palace, and heavy-handed response to dissent, including the execution of James Few after the Battle of Alamance. He suggests that Tryon's actions were motivated by personal vanity and a desire for ministerial approval, ultimately leading to widespread discontent and rebellion in the province. This is just a small portion of a very important document capturing the backcountrymen's outrage of that time period.

Here  is a transcript* of this excerpt -

"...to consult the Representatives of the People, who presented you a Bill which you passed into a Law. The Design of this Act was to punish past Riots in a new Jurisdiction, to create new Offences, and to secure the Collection of the publick Tax; which, ever since the Province had been saddled with a Palace, the Regulators had refused to pay. The Jurisdiction for holding Pleas of all capital Offences was, by a former Law, confined to the particular District in which they were committed. This Act did not change that Jurisdiction; yet your Excellency, in the Fulness of your Power, established a new One for the Trial of such crimes in a different District. Whether you did this through Ignorance or Design can only be determined in your own Breast; it was equally violative of a sacred Right every British Subject is entitled to, of being tried by his Neighbours, and a positive Law of the Province you yourself had ratified. In this foreign Jurisdiction, Bills of Indictment were preferred, and found, as well for Felonies as Riots against a Number of Regulators; they refused to surrender themselves within the Time limited by the Riot Act, and your Excellency opened your third Campaign. These Indictments charged the Crimes to have been committed in Orange County in a distinct District from that in which the Court was held. The Superior Court Law prohibits Prosecution for capital Offences in any other District than that in which they were committed. What Distinctions the Gentlemen of the Long Robe might make on such an Occasion I do not know, but it appears to me those Indictments might as well have been found in your Excellency’s Kitchen; and give me Leave to tell you, Sir, that a Man is not bound to answer to a Charge that a Court has no Authority to make, nor doth the Law punish a Neglect to perform that which it does not command. The Riot Act declared those only outlawed who refused to answer to Indictments legally found. Those who had been capitally charged were illegally indicted, and could not be Outlaws; yet your Excellency proceeded against them as such. I mean to expose your Blun-..."

*Literal transcript with "long S's" removed produced by Google Gemini

The full transcript of the historic "Atticus" letter is available to read at the UNC Documenting the American South collection and held within the Colonial and State Records group. You can read it in its entirety here. Mr. "Atticus" is very detailed in his laundry list of grievences - eight pages of them! He pulls no punches, accusing that Tryon's "legal charges are about as valid as if you had written them on a napkin in your kitchen." He further call high-ranking lawyers and judges "gentlemen of the long robe." He pushes stridently for "trial by neighbors," as opposed to trial in a distant city with the jury made up of the Governor's cronies. This is definitely worth a read if you want to get in the headspace of a pre-Revolutionary colonist living in the Piedmont region of North Carolina in the time period.

Johnston Riot Act

Primary Source: An Act for Preventing Tumultuous and Riotous Assemblies

Atticus at NCPedia

Captain Benjamin Merrell & The Regulators of Colonial North Carolina - selected reading from earlier published family histories.

Visit Wake County Genealogical Society's Website - Homepage | WCGS Events | Join WCGS | Publications | Wake Cemetery Survey Images | Society Surnames | Digital Resources | History Resources | More Links and Resources |  Donate | Contact - info(at)wakecogen(dot)org